| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/10/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/10/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
HOLLAS, C. E.; AMARAL, K. G. C. do; LANGE, M. V.; HIGARASHI, M. M.; STEINMETZ, R. L. R.; BARROS, E. C.; MARIANI, L. F.; NAKANO, V.; KUNZ, A.; SANCHES-PEREIRA, A.; JANNUZZI, G. de M. |
|
Afiliação: |
CAMILA ESTER HOLLAS, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná/Cascavel; KARINA GUEDES CUBAS DO AMARAL, Instituto 17; MARCELA VALLES LANGE, Instituto 17; MARTHA MAYUMI HIGARASHI, CNPSA; RICARDO LUIS RADIS STEINMETZ, CNPSA; EVANDRO CARLOS BARROS, CNPSA; LEIDIANE FERRONATO MARIANI, Instituto 17; VANICE NAKANO, Instituto 17; AIRTON KUNZ, CNPSA; ALESSANDRO SANCHES-PEREIRA, Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute; GILBERTO DE MARTINO JANNUZZI, Universidade de Campinas. |
|
Título: |
Life cycle assessment of waste management from the Brazilian pig chain residues in two perspectives: electricity and biomethane production. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 354, n. 131654, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131654 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: The decarbonization of production chains has focused on a more sustainable future with minor damage to the environment and protection of natural resources through existing waste while promoting economic development. Adopting public policies has encouraged circular approaches such as the waste to energy (WtE). Anaerobic digestion (AD) has been the most studied WtE strategy to help to reach the objectives in the agriculture sector. The swine waste represents an essential source of energy that can be converted into biogas by this treatment. The multiplicity of uses of the AD product (biogas) is strongly related to the environmental viability of the adopted technology. Hence, this study evaluates the environmental viability of five treatment biogas plants using residues from Brazilian swine production through a life cycle assessment (LCA), comparing the generation of electricity and biomethane as critical paths to promote change in the national energy matrix and increase decarbonization in the agricultural sector. Based on the results, both strategies prove to be environmentally favourable for mitigating environmental impacts caused during waste handling. Electricity generation can mitigate 100% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while biomethane production mitigates up to 114% of GHG emissions. Furthermore, the configuration of biogas production plants proves to be an exciting strategy to assist the treatment of waste generated in the context of small productive properties, making the adoption of this treatment economically feasible. MenosAbstract: The decarbonization of production chains has focused on a more sustainable future with minor damage to the environment and protection of natural resources through existing waste while promoting economic development. Adopting public policies has encouraged circular approaches such as the waste to energy (WtE). Anaerobic digestion (AD) has been the most studied WtE strategy to help to reach the objectives in the agriculture sector. The swine waste represents an essential source of energy that can be converted into biogas by this treatment. The multiplicity of uses of the AD product (biogas) is strongly related to the environmental viability of the adopted technology. Hence, this study evaluates the environmental viability of five treatment biogas plants using residues from Brazilian swine production through a life cycle assessment (LCA), comparing the generation of electricity and biomethane as critical paths to promote change in the national energy matrix and increase decarbonization in the agricultural sector. Based on the results, both strategies prove to be environmentally favourable for mitigating environmental impacts caused during waste handling. Electricity generation can mitigate 100% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while biomethane production mitigates up to 114% of GHG emissions. Furthermore, the configuration of biogas production plants proves to be an exciting strategy to assist the treatment of waste generated in the context of small productive prope... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Análise do ciclo de vida; Circular economy; Desperdício de energia; Economia circular; Life cycle analysis; Sustentabilidade; Waste to energy. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biogás; Digestão Anaeróbia. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Anaerobic digestion; Environmental sustainability. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02783naa a2200385 a 4500
001 2157380
005 2023-10-19
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131654$2DOI
100 1 $aHOLLAS, C. E.
245 $aLife cycle assessment of waste management from the Brazilian pig chain residues in two perspectives$belectricity and biomethane production.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aAbstract: The decarbonization of production chains has focused on a more sustainable future with minor damage to the environment and protection of natural resources through existing waste while promoting economic development. Adopting public policies has encouraged circular approaches such as the waste to energy (WtE). Anaerobic digestion (AD) has been the most studied WtE strategy to help to reach the objectives in the agriculture sector. The swine waste represents an essential source of energy that can be converted into biogas by this treatment. The multiplicity of uses of the AD product (biogas) is strongly related to the environmental viability of the adopted technology. Hence, this study evaluates the environmental viability of five treatment biogas plants using residues from Brazilian swine production through a life cycle assessment (LCA), comparing the generation of electricity and biomethane as critical paths to promote change in the national energy matrix and increase decarbonization in the agricultural sector. Based on the results, both strategies prove to be environmentally favourable for mitigating environmental impacts caused during waste handling. Electricity generation can mitigate 100% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while biomethane production mitigates up to 114% of GHG emissions. Furthermore, the configuration of biogas production plants proves to be an exciting strategy to assist the treatment of waste generated in the context of small productive properties, making the adoption of this treatment economically feasible.
650 $aAnaerobic digestion
650 $aEnvironmental sustainability
650 $aBiogás
650 $aDigestão Anaeróbia
653 $aAnálise do ciclo de vida
653 $aCircular economy
653 $aDesperdício de energia
653 $aEconomia circular
653 $aLife cycle analysis
653 $aSustentabilidade
653 $aWaste to energy
700 1 $aAMARAL, K. G. C. do
700 1 $aLANGE, M. V.
700 1 $aHIGARASHI, M. M.
700 1 $aSTEINMETZ, R. L. R.
700 1 $aBARROS, E. C.
700 1 $aMARIANI, L. F.
700 1 $aNAKANO, V.
700 1 $aKUNZ, A.
700 1 $aSANCHES-PEREIRA, A.
700 1 $aJANNUZZI, G. de M
773 $tJournal of Cleaner Production$gv. 354, n. 131654, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
